To me, the "updated" statement sounds like they are "halfway" back pedaling due to some external pressure or outcry... Probably the leadership got their mind ri

To me, the "updated" statement sounds like they are "halfway" back pedaling due to some external pressure or outcry... Probably the leadership got their mind right by someone, and decided that the original statement is too harshly phrased, so they made up the "draft, technical error" story. > As an early draft, the data points included in the email (such as “more than 75% of our members are unemployed and many have not been working for 18 months or more”) were not fact-checked and may be inaccurate. May be inaccurate? Well damn, is it or is it not?