4 ms·
Show HN: A better UI for ChatGPT, Claude with text search, saved chats and more
Video introduction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9UwZcM62Dc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9UwZcM62Dc
Link: https://www.teletyped.com/ https://www.teletyped.com/
Hey HN! My brother and I worked on this UI for ChatGPT, Claude, LLama 3, and Mistral models.
Our features:
- Full text search across all your chats
- Saved chats
- Switch models mid-chat
- Edit model outputs and continue generating, or save model responses for longer prompt engineering
- Temporary chats
- Edit model creativity (temperature)
- Different color themes
On our roadmap:
- Upload pdf files + photos (we know this an important one and plan to support in coming weeks)
- Web search + RAG for all models as a toggle
Really curious what you guys think!
- mutant 2y agoAbsolutely unusable on mobile.
- algoman 2y agoIf you are referring to the scroll issue for the temperature dial, we just fixed that!
- rrr_oh_man 2y agohttps://youtu.be/pqwOL6YfRIo https://youtu.be/pqwOL6YfRIo Please watch this — there are some lessons in this that definitely apply to your homepage.
- saasxyz 2y agothe site needs more working currently unusable but kudos to your design efforts
- anonzzzies 2y agoUnlike almost everyone, I have some eye sight issues which makes me immediate switch off dark mode as it makes it harder to read text. On this site, it’s impossible for me read most of it. Can’t please everyone, but this is quite rare.
- rrr_oh_man 2y agoThe text is in fact not very readable on iPhone mini (shifting yet always pretty low contrast, squished lines, that weird shadow/fade thing). Might look pretty on desktop, but on mobile it’s just confusing.
- youssefabdelm 2y agoThanks for the feedback! Brightened the text for now on our site + landing page, but it's probably still too dark. We plan on supporting light mode soon and giving people that toggle, will keep improving in general too.
- josefdlange 2y agoJust dropping in to say I appreciate the kind and friendly contextualization of your feedback. It would be really easy for someone in your position to be unfriendly in communicating this. This kind of tact and emotional intelligence is something I really cherish seeing from strangers on the Internet.
- tarasglek 2y agohttps://chatcraft.org https://chatcraft.org is my open source project in similar vein. Please try it, we expose free models so one doesn't have to log in. We have excellent mobile pwa, voice input, tts, search, sharing, make it easy to compare models. We also do wasm to support running ts,go,ruby. Its basically emacs disguised as a chat app. We wrote it as a way to utilize every cool feature llms have for own productivity, eg I can trivially build an adhoc clickhouse exploring tool in it. Can post examples if people are curious of specific abilities
- hu3 2y agoPlease post examples. I'm looking for such tool.
- tarasglek 2y agoHere is an example of creating release notes: 1. Call github api via running js code (which i generated in earlier convo..then deleted so i can have a nice template) 2. Asking llm to now summarize that 3. https://chatcraft.org/api/share/tarasglek/yxXY0wti4lbvrPP34C3wS https://chatcraft.org/api/share/tarasglek/yxXY0wti4lbvrPP34C... This is the feature I use most. chatcraft.org as text interface to github events and hackernews datasets hosted in clickhouse: https://chatcraft.org/c/tarasglek/pdAz4BRaYHib7jbFiYFFl https://chatcraft.org/c/tarasglek/pdAz4BRaYHib7jbFiYFFl
- Onawa 2y agohttps://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat I've been using LibreChat which has all of those features and more. Self hosted, MIT license, and auth built-in.
- EarthAmbassador 2y agoSorry, but very little is worth $26/month, in my view. If it operated as an uncensored model with guaranteed privacy, that might be worth something When combined with other features. Unfettered private creation and knowledge generation is a proper goal with LLMs.
- youssefabdelm 2y agoThanks for the feedback! We reduced the pricing to $20/month. I agree those features would be cooler, will definitely explore
- saberience 2y agoIt’s too easy to make a tool like this to charge that much. Several other people have posted similar tools to Hackernews and I made my own personal one in about a week. So yeah, ironically, gpts have made it way easier to make a basic gui to call some apis :)
- smcleod 2y agoThe site looks pretty broken at the moment, the text appears to be half faded out / missing? https://i.imgur.com/iBQwr2f.png https://i.imgur.com/iBQwr2f.png (FF125)
- youssefabdelm 2y agoDo you mean the search text preview? That gradient is intentional and when you hover over it (inside the actual site), it brightens up.
- spdustin 2y agoHow does one hover when not using a mouse/trackpad? I'll be more direct: it's unusable on touchscreen devices.
- youssefabdelm 2y agoGood point, we could disable the fade on mobile. The location of the gradient is parametric based on where the found keyword is. So if it's at the bottom, the gradient will be brighter there by default, or if the keyword is at the top, it'll be brighter there. If there's more than one match in a single preview, the gradient accommodates for that as well. So if your keyword is "potato" and it shows up at the top and bottom, there is no gradient (or it's very small such that there is none) There's typically enough text to discriminate (even before hover) When the user hovers, the area that isn't bright gets brighter.
- smcleod 2y agoHmm, ok. It doesn’t seem that obvious, it just looks like the page never finished loading.
- youssefabdelm 2y agoStill very useful to know, thank you for sharing. Will make the text brighter in general.