I'm not sure if I get your point here, but it's possible that "invisible" was too ambiguous. What I meant was that a memory bug may be less likely to cause noti

I'm not sure if I get your point here, but it's possible that "invisible" was too ambiguous. What I meant was that a memory bug may be less likely to cause noticeable functional changes to the behaviour of the program during everyday usage. I.e. the client won't notice them.