4 ms·
> insanely high energy requirements That is just for small personal cars, not even SUV or trucks. And requires a few megawatts... Very good argument to cancel
by Tom3849 2y ago
> insanely high energy requirements
That is just for small personal cars, not even SUV or trucks. And requires a few megawatts... Very good argument to cancel this whole insanity.
> coal and oil extraction
EV charging stations are still using oil and coal. Some are even build with diesel generators, as a "backup" (like at night).
- romafirst3 2y agoPetrol pumps also have insanely high energy requirements and take a long time to permit and build. And for good reason. They just get their energy via tanker. The fact that something needs energy doesn't mean we shouldn't build it. You keep talking about diesel generators. So what if these chargers have diesel generators for backup. People in EVs are probably ok with a fall back to diesel generators - they probably all used to drive petrol cars. It's not this smoking gun you think it is. The point is that we are moving from oil to not-oil and EVs make this a reality even if occasionally they fall back to the way things are done at the moment (i.e. using oil)
- Tom3849 2y ago1 megawatt connection is not question of some paperwork and permits, but massive underlying infrastructure. And that infrastructure is simply not there. If EVs use diesel generators and coal, they are not zero emmisions. In fact ICEs produce less CO2 emmisions, if you count energy losses from charging, battery production etc... It is another Enron waiting to happen!
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- romafirst3 2y agoThat’s why it takes time to build the infrastructure, that’s my point. It’s taken time to build all the other infrastructure, why do we think that a whole new transport infrastructure across all the states should just magically appear in 2 years.
- Tom3849 2y ago[flagged]