4 ms·
> Each protocol was designed to have a scan time of 8 minutes or less with an image resolution of approximately 2×2×8 mm³ very cool, but is it clinically usefu
by parpfish 2y ago
> Each protocol was designed to have a scan time of 8 minutes or less with an image resolution of approximately 2×2×8 mm³
very cool, but is it clinically useful if one edge of your voxel is 8mm?
- hesdeadjim 2y agoEasier to scale up than down once you have a starting point like this.
- nullc 2y ago8mm slice thickness isn't particularly at odds with what is commonly done on commercial machines, though usually there is a second transverse scan (which can't be readily fused due to patient movement). But even if it were, plenty of interesting structures are many centimeters in size, a thousand fold decrease in costs from eliminating cryogenic / high power magnets could be very useful.
- parpfish 2y agothe structures are many centimeters, but I assume that the sort of anomalies you'd be looking for in a clinical scan aren't going to be that large. if you had a fracture/tumor/damage-of-some-type that's small enough to fit between those slices and you didn't get the slices lined up just right the scan would miss it, no?