3 ms·

And that's totally fine :). It's worth noting that as a derivative of the FSL/BSL in four calendar years everything will be released back to the community under

And that's totally fine :). It's worth noting that as a derivative of the FSL/BSL in four calendar years everything will be released back to the community under the MPL-2.0. The shell implementation is already under the MPL-2.0 and worth a look at for anyone who's interested https://github.com/noisysockets/shell https://github.com/noisysockets/shell

yjftsjthsd-h 2y ago
> It's worth noting that as a derivative of the FSL/BSL in four calendar years everything will be released back to the community under the MPL-2.0. A 4-year-old version of security-critical software. You understand why this is less than compelling?
nabla9 2y ago
>It's worth noting that as a derivative of the FSL/BSL i Maybe, but we don't know until we hire a lawyer to check it out. And we don't. On the other hand, I don't think you can afford a lawyer to defend your bespoke license either. In either case, the license is meaningless.
- dymk 2y ago
  Clearly not meaningless if you’re avoiding using it to avoid risk of infringement
  - nabla9 2y ago
    It's the same as no license.
    - dymk 2y ago
      It's a license that hasn't been reviewed by legal, which is not the same as no license.