3 ms·
I think the best art is done within constraints -- namely because it forces the artists to be creative within those constraints. Their creativity is what is ins
by lordfrito 2y ago
I think the best art is done within constraints -- namely because it forces the artists to be creative within those constraints. Their creativity is what is inspiring.
When anything goes, you get splatters of paint on a canvas, which is much less interesting as it's much less creative. That, and the market forces as you said -- it's not creative, it's just signaling and marketing.
It's not high art, but what I admire about the original Star Wars film is that it was so difficult getting it made -- it took passion, talent, and craftsmanship to make a movie like that possible -- they had to literally invent new ways of doing things for that to be possible. Seeing the same kinds of movies today, where it's all done on computer -- requires less craft, less creativity -- and that's why these modern movies all feel uninspired.
Creativity within limits is where it is at.
- dingusdew 2y ago[dead]
- whilenot-dev 2y agoInteresting take on Star Wars, because I think it should rather be used as a counterexample: Star Wars was made during the starting era of the "Blockbuster"-movie[0]. Just after movies like Jaws (1975) were a huge success at the box office two years earlier, studios were willing to throw money at directors to counteract any creative constraints. Far better examples would have been The Blairwitch Project (1999) or Following (1998). [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockbuster_(entertainment)#Blockbuster_era https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockbuster_(entertainment)#Bl...