2 ms·
It really shouldn't, considering they have a rule about not using primary sources.
by jimbobthrowawy 2y ago
It really shouldn't, considering they have a rule about not using primary sources.
- _notreallyme_ 2y agoYes, they explicitly classify wikipedia as a tertiary source [1]. Wikipedia is good for finding secondary source, and then primary sources by following the links. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_and_Tertiary_Sources#Definitions_of_primary,_secondary_and_tertiary https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Primary_Secondary_an...