4 ms·
Discussion on misuse of "open source" by dokploy closed without comment
- fargle 2y agoalso see: https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/issues/82 https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/issues/82
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- fargle 2y agosome discussion about the licensing situation from couple days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40195480 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40195480 oh, and it was flagged. probably for self-promotion. of course.
- fargle 2y agothe limited feedback from https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=siumauricio https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=siumauricio here and the stonewall response to the, very serious, license issue discussion on github is very concerning. this has every look of a potentially talented developer that seriously misunderstands the legalities and role of open-source. there's probably a way to do what they intend, but this ain't it. and you don't make "open-source" but say "mine! mine! you can't change it/use it". does this violate any github policy? certainly the apache foundation should have a word.