A huge problem that peer review causes is that it supresses any new ways of thinking about stuff (eg in medicine, diet and physics): whenever a new idea comes t

A huge problem that peer review causes is that it supresses any new ways of thinking about stuff (eg in medicine, diet and physics): whenever a new idea comes that contradicts old ones the old scientists will dismiss it as "false" since "we already know how it works". Basicaly scientist's ego's destroy new science by using their credientialism to put down novel directions of research. Science progresses one funeral at a time.