3 ms·
Many of those sources are not available online (books), point at paywals (research papers) or are dead . Unless you have an API that can bypass these issues rel
by josefx 2y ago
Many of those sources are not available online (books), point at paywals (research papers) or are dead . Unless you have an API that can bypass these issues reliable you are stuck with a tool that has already landed several lawyers in hot water for making up citations on the fly.
- falcor84 2y agoThe Wikipedia Library project [0] grants active editors access to a wide range of otherwise paywalled sources. I wonder if it could not be extended to this sort of bot. [0] https://diff.wikimedia.org/2022/01/19/the-wikipedia-library-accessing-free-reliable-sources-is-now-easier-than-ever/ https://diff.wikimedia.org/2022/01/19/the-wikipedia-library-...
- eastbound 2y ago[flagged]
- 6510 2y agoWith similar topic like that it is very obvious but if you compare different topics some cant get enough articles while others must be merged and reduced to a stub. The best examples I know of is to have the entire discography with each album and each song their own article vs anything (historically significant) covered in skeptic wiki where no amount of sources is enough for a single article. More interesting, there must be literal miles of senseless discussion about this if what you describe came out of it.
- AlienRobot 2y agoWhat other, more honest endeavors are you talking about? It's very easy to attack others when you don't need to defend yourself. I want to see you say these things when you have an alternative with its own share of problems.