4 ms·
(2,3,5) because 2 to 3 = 1 and 3 to 5 = 2. 5 to 7 is also 2 so the gap does not grow, so 7 starts the next set.
by RockofStrength 2y ago
(2,3,5) because 2 to 3 = 1 and 3 to 5 = 2. 5 to 7 is also 2 so the gap does not grow, so 7 starts the next set.
- keepamovin 2y agoHey that’s cool I like that! Haha :) Thanks for sharing this. You have any GitHub repo or blog talking more about this??? :)
- RockofStrength 2y agoHere're a couple links for you: https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/cbd0a7/found_e_in_the_primes_maybe/ https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/cbd0a7/found_e_in_the... https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/ikwn03/e_in_the_primes_followup/ https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/ikwn03/e_in_the_prime... https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/n0mw3r/deriving_e_from_a_set_of_random_numbers/ https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/n0mw3r/deriving_e_fro...