3 ms·
If this was the first time they were packaging keepassxc, this would be fine. If they instead chose to remove the keepassxc package and provide two new packages
by jdbernard 2y ago
If this was the first time they were packaging keepassxc, this would be fine. If they instead chose to remove the keepassxc package and provide two new packages, keepassxc-minimal and keepassxc-full, it would be fine. It's the fact that the main package that people already have installed will no longer have functionality that many users depend on, breaking their configurations after an update.
- kasabali 2y ago> people already have installed will no longer have functionality that many users depend on, breaking their configurations after an update. They'll have to type apt install keepassxc-full ENTER after reading about the packaging change which they've been shown during package update. Wow what a nuisance.