4 ms·
Indeed, a homomorphism from A to B is an isomorphism from A to a subset of B. In other words, homomorphism is to injective as isomorphism is to bijective. So wh
by GrantMoyer 2y ago
Indeed, a homomorphism from A to B is an isomorphism from A to a subset of B. In other words, homomorphism is to injective as isomorphism is to bijective. So whether you say A is equivalent to B depends on how you define equivalent.
For anyone curious, while Category Theory is very concerned with morphisms, they also come up in many other places. In particular, Abstract Algebra (groups and rings and such) may be a more approachable introduction to morphisms than Category Theory, and then Category Theory flows pretty naturally from the concepts of Abstract Algebra.
- smohare 2y agoA generic homomorphism does not induce any isomorphism to a subset of B that I can think of unless it is already injective. The isomorphism you’re after is rather from the quotient structure of A mod the kernel to the image.
- alexanderchr 2y agoSimply consider any constant morphism and it is obvious that OPs statement is false. As you say one needs injectivity.