29 ms·
EXWM is ;). I used it for about a year, but ultimately found the performance, and in particular a low language server locking up the window manager, unacceptabl
by celrod 2y ago
EXWM is ;). I used it for about a year, but ultimately found the performance, and in particular a low language server locking up the window manager, unacceptable.
- smartmic 2y agoI just switched to exwm and I'm curious if the article will teach me some tricks which might be useful there. My initial experience is good but it is still a bit rough around the edges. In other words, I have not yet found my best configuration and workflows.
- nextos 2y agoStumpWM uses Common Lisp, and can be setup to be nearly identical to Emacs window management. It is also quite performant. Out of the box, its configuration is pretty nice already.
- cmrdporcupine 2y agoBut is there a reasonable way to handle emacs buffers inside stumpwm?
- nextos 2y agoYes, absolutely. There are several StumpWM modules providing integration with Emacs. You can also roll your own functions.