> … i.e., don't have PG? Not a problem, just introduce it into your architecture! (/s, from me, but I think the OP is serious.) I do think this is fairly simpl

> … i.e., don't have PG? Not a problem, just introduce it into your architecture! (/s, from me, but I think the OP is serious.) I do think this is fairly simply for many companies. > But I agree. These sort of "just keep wiring boxes together until it works" architectures cause so many headaches IME; so many pieces, each with its own failure modes and bugs. This is where I find the claim the OP makes, I agree, but PostgREST is a very very simple box... > With wired-together-boxes-of-random-tooling like this, I have to pray my change fits into the whims of its config files. ... that needs almost no configuration except the database connection string.