4 ms·
I like the response, seems very astute of an observation. Interpreting this in the worse light possible… in other words, gate keeping. I think a lot more peop
by salad-tycoon 2y ago
I like the response, seems very astute of an observation.
Interpreting this in the worse light possible… in other words, gate keeping.
I think a lot more people could understand and be mature in a lot more things if artificial and archaic barriers weren’t erected. I think not trusting the public is a recipe for an obscure elite ruling class. Sure, not a whole lot of people will get it but at least be open about it.
Then again, maybe there is a benefit to using that particular scale and I’ve been poisoned by my generational ills.
Not trying to be argumentative.
If I hazarded a guess it’s the second reason right?
- topherclay 2y agoThere's no artificial barriers being errected here by deciding to say "8" instead of writing out 8 zeros.
- diffeomorphism 2y agoObvious answer: compare 10000000 vs 7. Which is easier to understand?
- Kerb_ 2y agoI was taught logarithmic scales in middle school. If every concept needs to be dumbed down to a pre-middle school level for maximum accessibility (to minimize gatekeeping), you're going to end up with a public who literally can't comprehend the things they're being told because they stopped learning before middle school.
- ben_w 2y agoThat's a reason to not use Latin; but when it comes to numbers and scales… I was surprised to discover that other people are themselves often surprised when they learn that a billion is a thousand times larger than a million.
- closewith 2y agoWhich is itself a relatively recent standardisation. Up to the '70's, a billion could beat thousand million or million million depending on where you were.
- Toutouxc 2y agoWhich standardization? The world is still very much split between the long and short scale (and other systems) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales