5 ms·
>A jar of peanut butter that is best before January 2025 is one month older than one that is February 2025. Therefore, of course, you want to grab the latter on
by crtasm 2y ago
>A jar of peanut butter that is best before January 2025 is one month older than one that is February 2025. Therefore, of course, you want to grab the latter one
I don't follow you. In a few weeks I'll have eaten it all, I don't even look at the BBE on things like peanut butter.
- nightfly 2y agoHow much it matters really depends where you shop. Places like Grocery Outlet, or places that don't have super frequent business like small rural grocery stores, can be selling food that _right up to_ the best-by date.
- resolutebat 2y agoThe mom & pop Asian grocery in my hood has a discount section where basically everything is past the best by date. It's all packaged cookies and spice mixes and the kind of thing that won't kill you if it "expired" a week ago though.
- kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 2y agoI believe peanut butter was intended to be a generic example. Substitute something else at your pleasure.
- kazinator 2y agoThe point is that just because the best-before date is a year from now doesn't erase the fact that one item on the store shelf is a month older than another identical one.
- dylan604 2y agowhat does it say about the store you are at that has food that has dates that far apart? most products are received at the store from the factory from the same batch which means sameish dates. so how do the dates on the products vary that much on the shelf unless some gamesmanship is being done somewhere.
- sokoloff 2y agoIf peanut butter comes in cases of 24 that are in pallets of 144 cases and is delivered every month to the regional distribution center, many stores will have both the month and ++month product on the shelf at the same time. The alternative is to be frequently out of stock.
- watwut 2y agoIt just says that they restocked half empty shelf with newer stuff. The factory is not sending new batches every day. Month apart on something that is valid for years is oftentimes how they are spaced.
- VS1999 2y agoHow would I feel if I didn't eat breakfast this morning? I don't follow you. I did eat breakfast.
- joecool1029 2y agoSome people have a problem with this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_mind
- crtasm 2y agoWhat strange responses.
- userbinator 2y agoIf you know you'll consume it long before that date, then it certainly doesn't matter much. However, for those who buy infrequently and intend to store products for longer, it make sense to get the most recent production.
- kazinator 2y agoWhat makes it not matter is if you believe the opinion of the best before date to be true: if the stuff is just fine for a year, then it being a month older makes no difference. I'm of the opinion that fresher is fresher. What's my incentive for taking the older stuff, if it's not discounted? Only this one: saving a few seconds by not looking.
- Tijdreiziger 2y agoReducing food waste. If everyone optimizes for taking the ‘fresher’ product, the older one will sit on the shelf and eventually the store will throw it out.
- kazinator 2y agoI will buy it at at discount. If I need something and it's the last one (nothing to compare against), I will buy that also.
- dylan604 2y agoif it's in a can or box with a date that far into the future, using the word "fresh" seems incorrect in all aspect to me. if you want fresh, you shop on the outer walls of the super market. anything on the interior aisles is not fresh. I wish it were a thing that as you continued to the innermost sections the "food" became more processed, and instead of aisles, it was just a spiral to that point.
- BrandoElFollito 2y agoThis is probably a country specific thing. In France the vegetables will be right in the center of the shop. The butcher/cheese/fish section can be anywhere, it depends on the shop.
- bmacho 2y agoIt was an assumption that you will choose the more value for your money, even if it is pretty negligible. Some people do the opposite, when they buy something they choose the less value for their money (when it is negligible), if it maximizes the total value for the society.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- coldtea 2y ago>It was an assumption that you will choose the more value for your money, even if it is pretty negligible That incurs the opportunity cost of caring and checking labels for a "pretty negligible" marginal win. Fuck that.
- ajuc 2y agoIt frustrates me to no end when people do this with items that expire in a year. You aren't even maximizing your utility, you're just doing the shopping equivalent of "rolling coal".
- crtasm 2y agoRight, I'd get that if it were a case of wanting to store it for a long time or fresh food/things with a much shorter shelf life. I don't personally see any difference in value for this example.
- crazygringo 2y agoSure not for peanut butter. But I sure do for milk, eggs, yogurt, certain cheeses. It directly affects whether I might have to toss the last third of the milk by the time I get around to drinking it. Or whether the cheese will be growing mold before I finish it.