13 ms·
I'm pretty sure Card intended to condemn the wanton violence; either that, or the later books (which I also hugely prefer) were revisionist on the topic. He nev
by saraid216 14y ago
I'm pretty sure Card intended to condemn the wanton violence; either that, or the later books (which I also hugely prefer) were revisionist on the topic. He never characterizes Ender as anything but a monster, at best, he's an ignorant monster; the period between Ender's Game and Speaker for the Dead is an explicit search for redemption. Ender's Game was meant as a prequel, as I understand it, rather than to stand on its own.
That said, I've stopped recommending anything in the Ender books. There's just not enough there anymore.
- SoftwareMaven 14y agoEnder's Game came about as a necessary prequel to Speaker. Speaker for the Dead definitely isn't revisionist, it is the actual story. (Source is Card's afterward to the 20th anniversary edition of Ender's Game.)