3 ms·
Also, these two networks achieves vastly different results, per watt consumed. A NN creates a painting in 4s on my M2 MacBook; an artist in 4 hours. Are their u
by a_wild_dandan 2y ago
Also, these two networks achieves vastly different results, per watt consumed. A NN creates a painting in 4s on my M2 MacBook; an artist in 4 hours. Are their used joules equivalent? How many humans would it take to simulate MacOS?
Horsepower comparisons here are nuanced and fatally tricky!
- dsalfdslfdsa 2y agoWhat software are you using for local NN generation of paintings? Even so, the training cost of that NN is significant. The general point is valid though - for example, a computer is much more efficient at finding primes, or encrypting data, than humans.
- wrycoder 2y agoThe cost of training a human from birth is pretty high, especially if you consider their own efforts over the years. And they don't know a fraction of what the LLMs know. (But they have other capabilities!)
- causal 2y agoHumans aren't able to project an image from their neurons onto a disk like ANNs can, if they could it would also be very fast. That 4 hour estimate includes all the mechanical problems of manipulating paint.