3 ms·
Seems like that would trivially collapse to a matching function that doesn't need the fake "dates" going on between chatbots. Basically some version of the com
by andy99 2y ago
Seems like that would trivially collapse to a matching function that doesn't need the fake "dates" going on between chatbots. Basically some version of the compatibility match that dating companies talked up 20 years ago.
- noman-land 2y agoThe AI will speed run your entire life together and decide if it was worth it.
- solardev 2y agoBlack Mirror: Hang the DJ? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_the_DJ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_the_DJ
- kromem 2y agoBumble's entire product value was initially built around improving conversation initiation, which is a major hurdle in the dating app market. So no, you absolutely are going to need the virtual back and forth so you can hand it off to the real people to pick up from, and it makes a lot of sense an executive at Bumble is thinking about it this way.
- tgma 2y agoI think the reduction is not trivial. There are various ways it can be meaningfully different: 1. Conversation trail will be present for the human to investigate how we got there and leave some promises and commitments behind. 2. It could integrate human feedback in the process to let the human provide additional signal when necessary within the process. This is distinct from OKCupid style pre-emptive data collection and then running a matching algorithm.