4 ms·
"it doesn't look something that a good language/platform would ship with" Why do you think that?
by jshen 2y ago
"it doesn't look something that a good language/platform would ship with"
Why do you think that?
- nextaccountic 2y agoThey have a huge incentive to not publish an open source backend that can run locally and isn't sqlite, to inhibit you from actually using Deno KV in production (past from the sqlite limits) outside of their cloud. Check out this quote from the OP: > So, we set out to build two versions of the Deno KV system, with the same user-facing API. A version of Deno KV for local development and testing, built on SQLite, and a distributed systems version for use in production (especially on Deno Deploy). This post is about the implementation of the production, distributed systems version of Deno KV. If you’re interested in the SQLite implementation of Deno KV, you can read the source code yourself as it is open source. Intentionally crippled open source software for the sake of selling a cloud subscription really isn't a great feature Deno should ship. I think this situation is very different than Supabase. Supabase really publish the whole thing as Git repositories, and you can run it on your own servers if you wish.