4 ms·
You don't have to proactively read it. But when you notice your keepassxc doesn't work as it used to before, that should be a trigger for you to go back and rea
by Arnavion 2y ago
You don't have to proactively read it. But when you notice your keepassxc doesn't work as it used to before, that should be a trigger for you to go back and read it, note that it tells you very clearly that the functionality you're missing is now in keepassxc-full, apt-install it, and go on with your life.
- paulryanrogers 2y agoOne doesn't expect such a drastic ... 'fix' in a point release though.
- kasabali 2y agoYou're talking as if it's a point release of Debian. It is not. It happened in sid/testing, that's what these releases are for. Whether it happened in a point or major release of Keepassxc is irrelevant, because ignorant users who upgrade their sid/testing installations blindly as if it was stable-security would have hit it eventually.
- paulryanrogers 2y agoIMO insisting on a change like this would require retiring the original, un-suffixed name. And making separate -min and -full packages instead.