> The other CPU catch back after several months, the Apple Silicon is a good marketing prowess, the reality is that Apple CPUs wins because they are the first o

> The other CPU catch back after several months, the Apple Silicon is a good marketing prowess, the reality is that Apple CPUs wins because they are the first on to be produced on a new lithography node, because Apple can book a larger quantity than anyone else. Uh, but M2 on TSMC's N5 node is faster and more efficient than AMD's products fabbed with TSMC's N4 node. Edit: more efficient in general, but I meant "faster" in comparison with AMD's latest laptop chips. > Here Jim Keller explain why CPU architecture doesn't matter a lot in performance now: https://www.anandtech.com/show/16762/an-anandtech-interview- https://www.anandtech.com/show/16762/an-anandtech-interview-... Let's see what he has to say: > But instruction sets only matter a little bit - you can lose 10%, or 20%, [of performance] because you're missing instructions. 20% is quite a lot in the current competitive landscape. Jim Keller is stuck thinking like it's 10+ years ago.