> It is our responsibility to our users to provide them the most secure option possible as the default. All of these features are superfluous and do not really

> It is our responsibility to our users to provide them the most secure option possible as the default. All of these features are superfluous and do not really belong in a local password database manager While that sounds like a reasonable argument, I think it misses the fact that you need reasonable usability to get users to use your product. E.g there's no way my wife will use KP of she doesn't have autofill, and she'd then revert to someone else's computer like lastpazs or 1password instead, which I'd argue is a worse solution in all ways possible. The other thing that makes me question this a little, is removing yubikey support and auto type. While you don't get the full advantage of MFA, having a rotating encryption key is still an additional layer of protection. Meanwhile, without auto type you will need to copy-paste usernames and passwords - and listening to the clipboard is much easier than building a key logger. I mean, if really what you're looking for is barebones, you can also not use a password manager and come up with a cypher instead.