5 ms·
Well I hope they're better than the Russian attack helicopters. They lasted ... I want to say about 3 weeks. What's the plan, btw, if the west does not have ai
by candiodari 2y ago
Well I hope they're better than the Russian attack helicopters. They lasted ... I want to say about 3 weeks.
What's the plan, btw, if the west does not have air superiority due to Russians, or Iranians, having drones, and the west running out of smart rockets before they run out of drones, and the denial of communications works about as well for the West as it worked for Russia? (meaning, drone communications can be disrupted at 5 meters, which means the drone explodes 10 cm from your ass as opposed to directly in your face)
- rl3 2y ago>Well I hope they're better than the Russian attack helicopters. They lasted ... I want to say about 3 weeks. NATO forces are very, very good at combined arms actions in conventional wars. Assets aren't used unless there's a fairly high assurance of surviving and accomplishing the mission. >What's the plan, btw ... Western military planners have been watching the Ukraine conflict closely and are aware of the threat that cheap commercial drones pose, seeing as they're partly responsible for the phenomenon. >meaning, drone communications can be disrupted at 5 meters, which means the drone explodes 10 cm from your ass as opposed to directly in your face) The US in particular excels at dominating the EM spectrum. I wouldn't be surprised if enemy drones wholesale fall out of the sky en masse or are otherwise rendered totally ineffective.
- candiodari 2y ago> NATO forces are very, very good at combined arms actions in conventional wars. Assets aren't used unless there's a fairly high assurance of surviving and accomplishing the mission And how likely are NATO forces to run out of combined arms ammo after 2 weeks?