3 ms·
Why do you need a precedent to pass a law that improves the situation for every consumer and doesn't harm anyone dishonest?
by mihaic 2y ago
Why do you need a precedent to pass a law that improves the situation for every consumer and doesn't harm anyone dishonest?
- gruez 2y ago>Why do you need a precedent to pass a law that [...] When did I say that? I only claimed that having additional fees that are disclosed in fine print doesn't meet the legal definition of fraud, and that some rando calling it "fraud" doesn't make it so. That says nothing about whether I support California's SB 478, and in fact if you check my other comments I actually support it.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoDifferent words have different definitions. Annoying and burdensome is not the same as fraud. You can want to be free of both without conflating them.