4 ms·
If you are looking for short period events, losing a single frame can mean losing critical data. > Or they can just use that information for better scheduling:
by thayne 2y ago
If you are looking for short period events, losing a single frame can mean losing critical data.
> Or they can just use that information for better scheduling: wait a minute or two to image a particular spot, so there won't be satellites in the field of view.
Which means more time and effort, and ultimately money needs to be spent on scheduling observations to avoid the thousands of these satellites.
And sometimes it isn't an option. What if a GRB happens in the same field of view as one of these satellites and you want to observe it as soon as possible?
Now there are some types of observations that won't be impacted that much. If you can tolerate scheduling around it, or throwing away some of your frames it is just a minor annoyance. But a lot of observations are also more sensitive to such disruptions.
- serial_dev 2y ago> What if a GRB happens Yeah, what if? I mean, you probably missed the GRB, sure, but apart from that, you'll be fine and you can wait for the next one, or find a data from somewhere else.
- lifeisstillgood 2y agoGRB - Gamma Ray Burst (I am guessing)
- thayne 2y agoYes