2 ms·

I came here to find and agree with this comment. I've been seeing more stuff like this show up recently in OSS projects and it is extremely irritating. And I k

I came here to find and agree with this comment. I've been seeing more stuff like this show up recently in OSS projects and it is extremely irritating. And I know some people say "you are supposed to review AI-generated content before submitted", but I am also sure many new users will think the kind of crap advice that AI generates is OK. Those who don't know better, think AI is awesome and will solve all their problems. Those who do know enough to see the flaws don't need AI either. Ellipsis authors: please stop making open source worse. Buggy patches are worse than no patches, and 1 line hand-written summary is better then AI-generated useless one. I'll extend that to say "please stop making software worse." We were already drowning in mediocrity before AI accelerated it.

wiseowise 3y ago
> And I know some people say "you are supposed to review AI-generated content before submitted", but I am also sure many new users will think the kind of crap advice that AI generates is OK. We're watching development of idiocracy in real time. It'll start with "yeah, we're reviewing every content it generates" until new generation will stop thinking for itself completely and PRs will switch from machine-sceptic to "who are you to argue against computer?" (and not because machine became so good it's better than human).