3 ms·
The concern is increasing taxation of the young, productive population to sustain the old, non productive population causing political turmoil and decreasing na
by lotsofpulp 3y ago
The concern is increasing taxation of the young, productive population to sustain the old, non productive population causing political turmoil and decreasing national competitiveness on the global scale.
- nasmorn 3y agoClearly the old people of the future(us) will fight for their pensions in the thunderdome. Which also perfectly explains a lot of the ads I got recently about very muscular old guys
- missedthecue 3y agoReally, they will fight in the voting booth. Imagine US politics right now, but the boomer generation is 3x as big. That is going to be reality in most democracies in the next 20-40 years.
- rufus_foreman 3y agoGood point, young people just out of college who have lived off of their parents and the government for a quarter of a century might get upset about having to support non-productive people.
- ncruces 3y agoPeople will finally figure out that they're only productive for about a half their lives, and that it's not just the last quarter that they need help with, it's also the first. The real problem is the transition period where there are more unproductive people than not, because the stock of existing people is still here. That's why a crashing population is bad.
- jackcosgrove 3y agoThe question is if the complex society we have built actually requires growth to maintain it. In other words, our society requires 0.6 lives of work rather than 0.5. If this is the case, even a steady state would mean a lowered standard of living. It's hard to know, as our societies have decided to reduce costs on the front end (lowered birth rate) rather than on the back end (decreased longevity). That's understandable as someone who is never born doesn't suffer, but it's the worse solution from a social maintenance standpoint.