3 ms·
Workplace injuries. Not from any 'adversary'. Government doesn't want to admit liability for millions (billions?) in workplace injury claims. When the Syndrome
by simonblack 2y ago
Workplace injuries. Not from any 'adversary'. Government doesn't want to admit liability for millions (billions?) in workplace injury claims.
When the Syndrome hits in places all over the US and elsewhere (including Washington DC itself), the implication would be that some 'adversary' has weapons everywhere all over the world. That's a ridiculous idea. Far more likely is that the Government guys are doing something at work that damages them.
21st century version of 'Agent Orange', most probably.
- cleande 2y agoAttacks from an adversary, not workplace injuries. It's already been well established at this point by two separate expert panels.
- simonblack 2y agowell established at this point by two separate expert panels. I hate to ask it <grin>, but who exactly convened those two panels? https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-intelligence-community-convenes-panel-probe-havana-syndrome/story?id=78931427 https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-intelligence-community-co... And I see you bypassed this article: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/01/havana-syndrome-us-intelligence-services-determine-no-foreign-adversaries https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/mar/01/havana-syndr... I stand by my assertion that Havana Syndrome (even those cases very close to the White House in Washington DC) are caused by workplace injuries. It wouldn't be the first time (or last time) that the USG has denied any liability for the consequences of its actions on its own personnel. 'Agent Orange? What Agent Orange?' 'Gulf Syndrome? What Gulf Syndrome?'