It's obvious to anyone with any critical thinking that it should. If A and B are in an attrition war, and A and B can make no wins with production at their maxi

It's obvious to anyone with any critical thinking that it should. If A and B are in an attrition war, and A and B can make no wins with production at their maximum, but A can degrade B's replacement rate but B can't degrade A's replacement rate, who do you think is gonna win? It's not that complicated.