3 ms·
So Like the original NPR article that gives a high level explanation? (while establishing credibility by providing supporting references for cross checking) ht
by mint2 2y ago
So Like the original NPR article that gives a high level explanation? (while establishing credibility by providing supporting references for cross checking)
https://text.npr.org/1250212212 https://text.npr.org/1250212212
- orthecreedence 2y agoI think the person was making fun of me and not actually looking for resources.
- mint2 2y agoOkay… but the reference they called out wasn’t very long and had a clear bar chart comparing different vehicular types that included battery manufacturing as one of the components. One could even ignore all the text and just look at the bar chart for the numbers. Any original analysis that’s worth its beans is going to be far denser than that reference or the NPR article. Scientific and technical publications aren’t quite as bad as reading legalese but they’re close, full of jargon and precise language. Since that short reference with the bar chart was too dense, then what you’re looking for definitely seems to be a pop-sci type summary - like the original NPR article.
- orthecreedence 2y ago> what you’re looking for definitely seems to be a pop-sci type summary I found what I was looking for already. Both the NPR article and the chart were digestable for me. I originally complained the article had no numbers, but you prompted me to read it more closely at which point I found a study with the easy-to-read chart. I posted that study directly in a comment, then "ortusdux" made a snarky comment about needing a simpler article, which I assume was directed at me because I didn't originally find the references in the NPR article.
- mint2 2y agoOh… I thought your recent comment was also from that guy my bad, so yeah ignore what I’d replied. Guess I didn’t pay close enough attention