Letters and discussions we can dismiss outright. This is always a selective argument based on your leanings, and these are inevitably used to twist what are ot

Letters and discussions we can dismiss outright. This is always a selective argument based on your leanings, and these are inevitably used to twist what are otherwise fairly clear wordings even in the language of the day. A lot of people said a lot of things, but what matters is what is enshrined in law. What state constitutions of the day say something different than what is written in the federal constitution? I am interested in looking into it at least. ETA: I looked into it. Your argument only seems to have Pennsylvania as a leg to stand on, through the participation of Ben Franklin, and even that is flawed according to historians: https://journals.psu.edu/pmhb/article/download/59337/59064/0 https://journals.psu.edu/pmhb/article/download/59337/59064/0