Ive seen some of his content. Generally I find that he regards science and such well. Something I've noticed going through a cannabis legalization. What we wer

Ive seen some of his content. Generally I find that he regards science and such well. Something I've noticed going through a cannabis legalization. What we were told in the 1990s about cannabis was completely wrong. In their defense, because of it's classification it wasn't possible to do any studies. Only now can researchers actually research with it and we're overthrowing a great deal of ancient science from the past. But also paving way for future understandings. Looking at the allegation, his main assertion is 'there is literally no research that has ever been done" Sure because it was illegal. Now the studies are coming in and perhaps the best argument is that it's not settled science? Or perhaps that Andrew overstated positions?