3 ms·
The 'though it'd probably take a while for the brain to understand the new information' is an interesting question; on one hand people say you need to fix stuff
by trebligdivad 2y ago
The 'though it'd probably take a while for the brain to understand the new information' is an interesting question; on one hand people say you need to fix stuff early in development while the brain is still very plastic (so great for this kid); but then again there is that demo of people getting used to vertically flipped vision with weird glasses; so perhaps something is flexible?
- adgjlsfhk1 2y agoyeah I'd be pretty surprised if your brain didn't figure it out in a week.
- wizzwizz4 2y agoThe brain is good at re-mapping things where it can make a distinction, but it seems to only learn distinctions in so-called "critical periods". See doi:10.1038/228477a0 for a famous 1970s experiment on the subject.
- lupire 2y agoThere are lots of examples. Phonemes for language and are a very common example of things that can't be learned easily or at all later in life. But huge changes like a major color might overcome that. Humans learn to recognize new major objects they've never seen before.
- wizzwizz4 2y agoHumans can learn to recognise new sensory modalities, too (see paragraph 4 of doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00443's introduction) – but only if there's hardware that responds to them. The question is whether the visual cortex is capable of making the distinctions. If colourblindness glasses (e.g. EnChroma®) work for you, then I suppose the answer is trivially "yes, because it already does" – and we should expect gene therapy to be useful. If there are people for whom those glasses don't do anything at all, I'd be more cautious.