5 ms·
They are doing that, with the California Forever project, which is equally as dumb
by babelfish 2y ago
They are doing that, with the California Forever project, which is equally as dumb
- trhway 2y agoMy idea is even more "dumber" - 12+ miles off the shore of SF. Drive a lot of pillars and pour a lot of concrete and build some similar monstrosity to that "Wall City" Saudis are planning in the desert (or that Star Trek Millennium Tower). Don't need even city charter from the state, no voter approval, etc. Fast hydroplaning taxis to SF, etc. Probably some no-work-visa loopholes.
- supportengineer 2y agoWhy not just repeat Foster City along the entire bay shore?
- trhway 2y agoPersonally I think we don't need to screw the Bay further, and it would be taking away marsh habitat from birds and other animals whereis building in the ocean would create new habitat underwater and a new overwater place for the birds (kind of micro-Faralon). And I also think that building a large foundation in 100-200ft deep ocean is easier and more feasible than dealing with all the issues wrt. truly large development in Bay Area.
- xnx 2y agoBluthton? https://arresteddevelopment.fandom.com/wiki/Transcript_of_The_Ocean_Walker#:~:text=Instead%20of%20making%20houses%2C%20maybe%20you%20should%20make%20land https://arresteddevelopment.fandom.com/wiki/Transcript_of_Th....
- petesergeant 2y ago> which is equally as dumb What’s dumb about it? As someone who heard about 5 minutes ago, and did 5 minutes of research, it doesn’t look that dumb