3 ms·

Yes. Because that person is no longer physically at risk. Now whether they consent to their image being used is a different type of exploitations that needs to

• woodruffw 2y ago
  > Because that person is no longer physically at risk. I don't know if I would describe someone whose image is subject to arbitrary manipulation per anybody's fantasies as "no longer physically at risk." There's a nontrivial amount of precedent for mentally unwell people building up parasocial relationships that they then (violently) act on; it's not inconceivable that AI would facilitate those. But even beyond that: you're approaching this from a baseline assumption is everyone who makes adult content is "physically at risk," which probably isn't true. The reality is that it's a spectrum, and that there is probably a large demographic that isn't harmed by the content they voluntarily produce, but would be harmed by content produced from a model trained on their data. As an intuitive example: someone who does boudoir photography or burlesque is clearly not inviting an AI to produce "harder" content using their likeness, and would be harmed by that.