3 ms·
Why does it need to be “responsible”? I feel these words are intentionally misleading about what they are - morality codes based on a small number of people’s o
by blackeyeblitzar 3y ago
Why does it need to be “responsible”? I feel these words are intentionally misleading about what they are - morality codes based on a small number of people’s opinions.
I can’t read the linked article (paywall) but others on the same topic say that OpenAI would like to explore supporting whatever is not illegal, but that deepfakes are out of the question. Are deepfakes illegal and should they really be? Deepfakes are no different from what goes on in people’s heads. Should the law really restrict that expression? I can see restricting passing off deepfakes as real to embarrass someone, but we already have laws for things like defamation. And if it isn’t illegal but just expression, should OpenAI support it?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- mcphage 3y ago> morality codes based on a small number of people’s opinions. In this case specifically, the "small number of people" happen to be "the people who work at OpenAI".
- blackeyeblitzar 3y agoIt’s not all the people at OpenAI. It’s a few people on a “safety” (euphemism) team in turn responding to outside pressure from a few loud people.
- mcphage 3y ago> It’s a few people on a “safety” (euphemism) team in turn responding to outside pressure from a few loud people. It's weird you don't think that someone in OpenAI would care how their software is used, that it's due to outside influence.