4 ms·
I agree that there is a difference, but a very small difference. Even animals share their prey with those who didn't participate in the hunt. If the general po
by carlosjobim 3y ago
I agree that there is a difference, but a very small difference. Even animals share their prey with those who didn't participate in the hunt.
If the general population started eating hunted meat, vast agricultural areas would be returned to nature, giving a slight offset to that problem.
But jumping back to reality, those people who actually hunt and purchase hunted meat right now are people who care about nature and shepherd it with responsibility. They can safely ignore any hacker that starts yapping about some law written by unnatural people.
- sandworm101 3y agoThe selling of hunted meet to the general population for profit is a very very slippery slope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punt_gun https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punt_gun
- Marsymars 3y ago> If the general population started eating hunted meat, vast agricultural areas would be returned to nature, giving a slight offset to that problem. I don't think the math works here. There isn't enough agricultural area on the planet to sustainably generate enough hunted Calories for the general population.
- carlosjobim 3y agoI wrote "slight offset".