4 ms·
> You basically picked the worse possible task for ChatGPT Wow, what were the odds on that?? :) I'd be interested in verification, so will start a new thread
by chrisjj 3y ago
> You basically picked the worse possible task for ChatGPT
Wow, what were the odds on that?? :)
I'd be interested in verification, so will start a new thread for that.
> The tasks you’re looking to accomplish will likely have much better success if you break it into two “human-to-code” steps.
> 1. Ask ChatGPT to explain what the Python code is doing, line-by-line
The answer is "However, there's a logical flaw and a few issues in the implementation:" followed by points every one of which is in error, showing ChaptGPT has deeply mis"understood" the code.
> 2. Then ask ChatGPT to write the equivalent Lisp code for the description
The result fails with "odd number of &KEY arguments".