> An intern using LLMs to generate bad untested code is no different than an intern using Stack Overflow to generate bad untested code Very different. An LLM l

> An intern using LLMs to generate bad untested code is no different than an intern using Stack Overflow to generate bad untested code Very different. An LLM lets him generate /far more/ bad untested code per unit of effort. And SO encourages other humans to test it. Often an SO answer comes with evaluative comments and ratings that are all I need to reject it. If the LMM was "AI", it would at least provide the same, right? > A better path is to ensure they are spending significantly more time reviewing, testing, and incrementally improving their code than they are typing/generating it Then let's see the LLM-based workflow that achieves that...