3 ms·
Agreed. If the dependency is under active development then it should be only counted as being behind if there is a newer version released for that dependency. T
by planede 2y ago
Agreed. If the dependency is under active development then it should be only counted as being behind if there is a newer version released for that dependency. The libyear should be calculated as "latest version's release date" - "currently used version's release date".
What complicates this is deciding whether the dependency is under active development or not. If its EOL'd then you still want libyear to accumulate, even if you use the latest released version. I guess comparing to an end-of-life date then would make sense, but it's probably harder keep track of.
- __alexs 2y agoIf a project is not under active development it may just be "done". How many minor version bumps per year does left-pad need?