3 ms·
Thank you for your validation. Indeed, we have removed the title from the standard issue creation process. We are also actively working to improve it.
by harshithmul 2y ago
Thank you for your validation. Indeed, we have removed the title from the standard issue creation process. We are also actively working to improve it.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 2y agoI’ll also add, not shilling for you, but only because I think it is valuable boots on the ground information: The product owners in our org don’t ever use this feature. The only people that use this Linear feature are engineers like myself who are more interested in doing work than spending all day writing about work in tickets.
- harshithmul 2y agoGotcha thank you :+1
- SOLAR_FIELDS 2y agoAlso since you are thinking in this space, you are probably interested in WHY it’s wrong 25% of the time. It’s because the way slack discussions about issues go is heterogeneous in our org. If you are lucky someone was diligent and made it into thread, at which point the AI is quite good at its job. But often (myself included, because sometimes you’re just lazy and sometimes in an incident things don’t necessarily happen in the cleanest way) no threads are created and you need to gen a ticket off a single sentence. Which if you feed as part of a RAG-like prompt is not going to be very useful in a lot of cases. Unfortunately there’s no clean obvious way to “guess” what the context is under those conditions, but maybe someone can be clever with heuristics to try to do that where they perhaps feed the last X amount of tokens in from slack and do a Langchain-like approach where first the context is summarized in the initial call and then the title is generated from that summary
- harshithmul 2y agoThanks a ton. That's a lot of detailing on the use-case. We will definitely put these thoughts as we improvise.
- kissgyorgy 2y agoBro, work in tickets is half the solution to a problem!