2 ms·
Yep. It often "reasons", as much as it does, best with regular language. And sometimes, just like with real people, it works better if one or more intermediat
by ssl-3 3y ago
Yep. It often "reasons", as much as it does, best with regular language.
And sometimes, just like with real people, it works better if one or more intermediate steps are interposed. But it doesn't necessarily "know" this -- just as real people mightn't.
It's not unfair to say "Yeah, well if the bot was so smart then why didn't it just take care of that intermediate step for me?"
But it's also not unfair to retort "Well, if you were so smart then why did you expect perfect results from an imperfect tool without expending any real effort to understand and/or explain the thing on your part?"
- Jensson 3y ago> But it's also not unfair to retort "Well, if you were so smart... But it was the tool being evaluated, not the person. If the person has to code in natural language then why not just code it directly?