3 ms·
This article is extremely biased towards SO: > Stack Overflow and OpenAI have joined forces through a new API partnership. This collaboration aims to provide
by FireBeyond 3y ago
This article is extremely biased towards SO:
>
Stack Overflow and OpenAI have joined forces through a new API partnership. This collaboration aims to provide developers with a powerful combination of Stack Overflow’s vast knowledge platform and OpenAI’s advanced AI models. Through the OverflowAPI access, OpenAI users will benefit from accurate and verified data from Stack Overflow, facilitating quicker problem-solving and enabling technologists to focus on priority tasks. Additionally, OpenAI will integrate validated technical knowledge from Stack Overflow into ChatGPT, enhancing users’ access to reliable information and code.
Come on. Was this taken from a Press Release?
> it can be disruptive to the entire community to delete or remove content that might be useful to someone else. Even if this content is no longer useful to you as the author. [sic]
> As for the rest of us Stack Overflow users, I would not recommend jumping to delete your own content in protest too.
> To be fair to Stack Overflow, the warning email and suspending of accounts is likely not a new thing.
I can't find a negative word about SO in this entire article, so "to be fair" doesn't seem meaningful.
- nicklecompte 3y agoIf you check the byline, the author is a Microsoft MVP / product evangelist. So I don't think he's biased towards SO so much as he is biased towards anyone doing business with Microsoft (or OpenAI). He also seems very pro-GitHub Copilot.