4 ms·
As an early user of SO, I certainly don't want my answers sold for profit again and again.
by j45 3y ago
As an early user of SO, I certainly don't want my answers sold for profit again and again.
- jonathankoren 3y agoYour answers are already sold for profit again and again. That's the whole point of SO existing, or maybe you under some delusion that SO is a charity?
- j45 3y agoNo delusion. Specific licensing and side deals is different to me at least than scraping.
- vkou 3y agoThen you shouldn't have been posting on SO. If you want to contribute to the commons, contribute to the commons. If you want to contribute to the commons without commercialization of your work, contribute with some non-com license [1]. If you want to feed a corporation with your labour, post on SO. [1] It'll still be illegally scraped and commercialized by some AIBro, and you'll have no proof or recourse against them...
- j45 3y agoScraping to me is different than side licensing the content in some other form or usage than what it was created for. Licensing also means the writer retains the ownership. Cc-by-sa has had a few revisions too.
- kragen 3y agothe so license is cc-by-sa and has been since the beginning, not cc-by-nc-sa
- j45 3y agoTrue. Cc-by-sa has had a few revisions. Attribution would be lost in an llm, no?