3 ms·

The only feedback I would give is I'm suspicious of (will not buy) closed sourced AI anything. With that said: thank you for sloughing off the subscription mode

The only feedback I would give is I'm suspicious of (will not buy) closed sourced AI anything. With that said: thank you for sloughing off the subscription model trend! That is welcome. But going open source so that I know "for sure" no telemetry is being sent and charging for support would be the only way to get money out of me for this. I'm probably the odd one out for this, so take that with a fair helping of salt. This is a great idea, so much so that this is also something I could probably put together a MVP of in a weekend (or two) of dedicated work (the fancy features that I personally don't care about would probably take longer to implement, of course...). Good work! Keep it up.

setnone 2y ago
Thank you! I would love if we had some kind of 'open-build' methodology so those projects not willing to open the source but are willing to perform any kind of necessary audit against the build, just a thought.
IanCal 2y ago
> But going open source so that I know "for sure" no telemetry is being sent and charging for support would be the only way to get money out of me for this. Is the self hosted option a workable solution for you? https://www.grafychat.com/d/docs/selfhost https://www.grafychat.com/d/docs/selfhost Unless it's minified I guess.
- altruios 2y ago
  I would only use this (or any ai) self-hosted if it works 100% offline. I would also not want it minified - as I would want the freedom to tinker with it to my personal specifications. Which makes me ask a question: what rights would I have to modify this software, per your license?
  - setnone 2y ago
    > Which makes me ask a question: what rights would I have to modify this software, per your license? Permission to deploy and use compiled code only, no modification, redistribution, sharing or reselling.
    - altruios 2y ago
      And the 'no modification' is exact-why you lose me.
  - setnone 2y ago
    > I would only use this (or any ai) self-hosted if it works 100% offline. Well this is absolutely possible with ollama app running on your device and self-host package running on localhost.

setnone 2y ago

Thank you! I would love if we had some kind of 'open-build' methodology so those projects not willing to open the source but are willing to perform any kind of necessary audit against the build, just a thought.

IanCal 2y ago

> But going open source so that I know "for sure" no telemetry is being sent and charging for support would be the only way to get money out of me for this. Is the self hosted option a workable solution for you? https://www.grafychat.com/d/docs/selfhost https://www.grafychat.com/d/docs/selfhost Unless it's minified I guess.

altruios 2y ago
I would only use this (or any ai) self-hosted if it works 100% offline. I would also not want it minified - as I would want the freedom to tinker with it to my personal specifications. Which makes me ask a question: what rights would I have to modify this software, per your license?
- setnone 2y ago
  > Which makes me ask a question: what rights would I have to modify this software, per your license? Permission to deploy and use compiled code only, no modification, redistribution, sharing or reselling.
  - altruios 2y ago
    And the 'no modification' is exact-why you lose me.
- setnone 2y ago
  > I would only use this (or any ai) self-hosted if it works 100% offline. Well this is absolutely possible with ollama app running on your device and self-host package running on localhost.