>Apple has been fighting to push back at the tide of design violations put forward by companies like Samsung and others. If you can name even one instance of wh

>Apple has been fighting to push back at the tide of design violations put forward by companies like Samsung and others. If you can name even one instance of where Apple has directly sued a small company over a technology patent I would be surprised. Is this some sort of revisionist history? What about these ~20 patents? I'd like to know which ones you consider as design patents. http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/02/apple-vs-htc-a-patent-breakdown/ http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/02/apple-vs-htc-a-patent-bre... I am not even going to waste my time listing patents used to sue Motorola and Samsung because I believe you're the one trying to handwave things here. >The pricing scheme where DOS was $60 and the very same DOS + Windows was $30 God forbid a company set the price of its own products according to competitive pressures. What next? Kindle Fire should be banned? >The way they would switch up Windows to "break" other competing applications like WordPerfect and Lotus 1-2-3? Care to elaborate or provide references? Is there really a case of WordPerfect and Lotus 1-2-3 running well on one version of Windows and breaking on the next?