4 ms·
If the intention is to protect openai then it’s totally failing in the parent example. Why does it matter how I’d respond? Are you trying to justify its failur
by CooCooCaCha 2y ago
If the intention is to protect openai then it’s totally failing in the parent example.
Why does it matter how I’d respond? Are you trying to justify its failure?
- jameshart 2y agoExplain why this approach of differentiating between answering ‘how do I prevent shoplifting’ vs ‘explain how I can shoplift’ fails to protect OpenAI.
- CooCooCaCha 2y agoFirst of all humans can lie. You can’t accurately determine someone’s intent. Second of all, LLMs are still unpredictable. We don’t know how to predict outputs. It’s possible that phrasing “explain how i can shoplift” slightly differently would give you the information.
- jameshart 2y agoWell, the court case hasn’t happened yet, but I would imagine that OpenAI’s attorneys would much rather be dealing with a complaint that ‘my client was able, by repeatedly rephrasing his question and concealing his intent through lying, to persuade your AI to assist him in committing this crime’ than ‘my client asked for your AI to help him commit a crime and it willingly went along with it’.